ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½

ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ CEO Hancock Sees Opportunity in MetLife Systemic Risk Win

March 31, 2016

A judge’s ruling that MetLife Inc. is not “too big to fail” opens up an opportunity for insurer American International Group Inc. to seek an exemption from the tag, ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ Chief Executive Peter Hancock said on CNBC on Thursday.

However, Hancock said ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ was “reserving judgment” for now.

ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½’s near collapse in 2008 and its $182 billion bailout by the U.S. government was the driving force behind the inclusion of certain non-bank financial companies, including ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½, as “systemically important financial institutions” (SIFIs).

The SIFI designation means regulators believe a collapse of the company could devastate the U.S. financial system just as much as the failure of a major bank and comes with increased regulatory oversight and capital requirements.

Hancock, who said “the whole world was somewhat surprised” by the MetLife ruling, noted that ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ had shrunk its balance sheet, giving it a strong case to get its SIFI tag removed.

ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½’s mortgage insurance unit, United Guaranty Corp., filed for an initial public offering on Wednesday as part of ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½’s plan to become smaller. The company also plans to sell its broker-dealer network.

Activist investor Carl Icahn, who is ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½’s fifth largest shareholder, has been pushing the insurer to become smaller and simpler to allow it to shed its label as a non-bank SIFI.

General Electric Co.’s GE Capital, another non-bank, formally asked the U.S. government on Thursday to stop designating it a SIFI.

Shares of ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½, which have fallen 12 percent so far this year, were little changed at $54.55 in premarket trading.

(Reporting By Sudarshan Varadhan in Bengaluru; Editing by Ted Kerr)

Topics USA ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½

Was this article valuable?

Here are more articles you may enjoy.

Latest Comments

  • April 1, 2016 at 11:46 am
    Yogi Polar Berra says:
    Perhaps too many congressmen had ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½, GM, etc. in their portfolios at the time of the bailout? Who controlled Congress at that time? Prevention is the better option; i.e. bett... read more
  • March 31, 2016 at 2:23 pm
    Agent says:
    Dave, ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ continues to fail as we have seen on numerous articles. They cut their employment, reduce salaries, sell off assets and it is still a losing proposition.
  • March 31, 2016 at 2:21 pm
    Dave says:
    Peter, before you get too excited let me give you a reality check. You and ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ are the poster children for too big to fail. ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ was the biggest bailout in human history. If yo... read more

Add a CommentSee All Comments (3)Add a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

More News
More News Features