A New York state appeals court rejected former American International Group Inc. Chairman Maurice “Hank” Greenberg’s bid to dismiss a decade-old lawsuit accusing him of orchestrating an accounting fraud at the insurer.
The court found that the New York attorney general’s claim for Greenberg to disgorge millions of dollars in allegedly ill-gotten bonuses was “legally viable.”
Greenberg, 89, and his co-defendant, former ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ Chief Financial Officer Howard Smith, who also faces the claim, are accused of orchestrating sham transactions at the insurer.
The defendants failed to show the lack of incentive compensation resulting from the sham transactions at ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½, the Appellate Division, First Department ruled.
New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman, who is pursuing the lawsuit initially brought by his predecessor, Eliot Spitzer, also seeks to ban the defendants from the securities industry and from serving as officers or directors of public companies.
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Marsh Aims to Be ‘AI Winner’ by Focusing on Gains in Growth, Productivity, Efficiency
Hedge Fund Money Is Reshaping a 180-Year-Old Insurance Model
Ex-CEO, Ex-CFO of Bankrupt AI Company Charged With Fraud
AI for the Defense: Should Insurers or Law Firms Pay? 

