A top executive at American International Group Inc. has resigned because of pay curbs imposed by the Obama Administration’s pay czar, the insurer said last week.
Anastasia Kelly, ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½’s vice chairman for legal, human resources, corporate affairs and corporate communications, resigned effective Dec. 30 for “good reason” and is eligible for severance pay under the terms of the company’s executive severance plan, the insurer said.
Kelly stands to be paid about $2.8 million in severance, according to a source familiar with the matter.
Kelly’s resignation comes after Kenneth Feinberg, who is charged with monitoring pay levels at companies that received taxpayer funds, imposed pay caps for ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½’s top executives.
Earlier this month, Feinberg set the compensation structures for the 26th through 100th highest-paid employees at four firms, including ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½, limiting most cash salaries to $500,000.
Feinberg also granted less than a dozen special exemptions from the cash salary cap, including several ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ executives, after being urged to do so by Federal Reserve and Treasury officials.
Kelly met frequently with Feinberg to discuss pay issues as he prepared to rule on compensation at companies that received extraordinary taxpayer bailouts.
She was among five executives reported by The Wall Street Journal to have notified the insurer that they were prepared to resign and collect severance benefits if their pay was cut sharply by Feinberg. Chief Executive Robert Benmosche separately also had considered quitting because of the pay constraints, the Journal has reported.
Cornelius Hurley, director of the Morin Center for Banking and Financial Law at Boston University, said no ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ employee was irreplaceable.
“We have been duped into thinking that these ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ employees have some kind of secret code that no other employee could discover if they were hired to replace them and therefore they are able to basically hold the company ransom,” Hurley said.
ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ had to be propped up with some $180 billion in taxpayer support after its near collapse in September 2008. The U.S. government now owns nearly 80 percent of the company, once the world’s largest insurer by market value.
The government stepped in to rescue ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ after it ran short of funds to meet collateral demands from global banks that had bought credit protection from an ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ financial products unit. The government saw the company’s possible collapse as a systemic risk.
ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ angered many Americans earlier this year when it paid million-dollar retention bonuses — payments simply for staying in their jobs — to executives at a financial products unit that was responsible for its financial implosion.
The insurer also said that Suzanne Folsom, chief compliance and regulatory officer, has left to pursue other opportunities. It was unclear if her departure was related to the pay issue.
It said it is looking for successors for both officials.
(Reporting by Steve Eder and Paritosh Bansal; Editing by Gary Hill, Robert MacMillan, Leslie Gevirtz)
Topics ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
AI for the Defense: Should Insurers or Law Firms Pay?
Chubb Q1 Net Income Increases 74% on Fewer Catastrophe Losses
Oil Trader CFOs Say Hormuz Closure Driving Wave of Disputes
Hedge Fund Money Is Reshaping a 180-Year-Old Insurance Model 

