The long-time accounting firm for American International Group, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, reportedly ignored warnings from the audit committee for the ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ board of directors when that panel said in 2001 and 2002 that it could not vouch for the insurer’s accounting and internal financial controls, according to a story in the Washington Post.
The audit committee, whose responsibility is to oversee the work of the outside accounting firm PWC, reported in ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½’s annual corporate filings for those years that it could not independently confirm that ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ management “maintained appropriate accounting and financial reporting principles.”
According to the Washington Post, the committee also commented that it could not assure that PWC was truly acting in an independent role.
The story notes that it is not entirely unusual for audit committees to include language which casts doubt on the independence of the accounting firm, but it also quotes accounting experts that the language used by the ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ audit committee was unusually strong.
A spokesman for PWC told the Post that similar language has been used by other large companies and would not have been seen as a “red flag” by auditors.
The audit committee’s caution has been cited in a lawsuit brought by the attorney general of Ohio against ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½ accusing the insurer of securities fraud and PWC of issuing “false and misleading” financial reports on ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½.
Topics ÌìÃÀÍøÕ¾´«Ã½´«Ã½
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
‘The Arms Race Is On’: Chubb’s Greenberg on Mythos, Middle East
Chubb Q1 Net Income Increases 74% on Fewer Catastrophe Losses
Florida Needs More – Much More – Wind Mitigation, Say Experts at OIR Summit
Marsh Aims to Be ‘AI Winner’ by Focusing on Gains in Growth, Productivity, Efficiency 

