The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has ruled that civil lawsuit plaintiffs alleging asbestos-related ailments cannot submit scientific testimony asserting that even the smallest exposure to the material could cause cancer.
The court said in a 6-0 opinion issued last Wednesday that plaintiffs must show some relationship between the amount of exposure and development of the disease.
The ruling came in a western Pennsylvania auto mechanic’s 2005 lawsuit alleging that exposure to asbestos from brake lining repair over 44 years had caused his mesothelioma.
A Superior Court panel said a jury should evaluate the “any exposure” testimony, but the high court said the trial judge “was right to be circumspect” about the underlying scientific methodology. The Philadelphia Inquirer says attorneys for the plaintiff did not return a phone call seeking comment.
Topics Pennsylvania
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
Nationwide: Consumers Say Insurance Should Evolve for Micromobility Vehicles 
State High Court Weighs in on Woman Taken for Organ Donation But Was Still Alive 
Electric Bills in Coal Country West Virginia Now Top Mortgage Payments 
Florida Needs More – Much More – Wind Mitigation, Say Experts at OIR Summit 
