Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. v. Dennison
(Hawaii Court of Appeals, Oct. 11, 2005)
Ruling: The insurer in this case filed a declaratory judgment action against its insured, alleging that it was not liable for emotional distress damages caused when the insured saw his son was being treated following an automobile accident. On appeal, the court vacated the lower court’s ruling in favor of the insured and held that because the insured was not in the vehicle with his son at the time of the accident, he could not maintain an independent claim against the insurer under the auto policy.
Topics Auto
Was this article valuable?
Here are more articles you may enjoy.
State High Court Weighs in on Woman Taken for Organ Donation But Was Still Alive
Viewpoint: Japan’s $550B Bet on America—What it Means for the US Insurance Market
Electric Bills in Coal Country West Virginia Now Top Mortgage Payments
Business Interruption Claims Arising From the Middle East Conflict 


